Fragen über die Beispielsätze mit, und die Definition und Benutzung von "France"

A: It probably means that his/her experiences during his/her pre-adolescence was limited to the island he/she grew up in before he/she went to France.

A: フランスに行った。そのtenseは"present perfect"。した事を今までしてるならそれを使って

A: It could mean both depending on the context of the conversation (if you were speaking to someone).
“He is always traveling to France,” would mean that he goes there very frequently.
“He always travels to France,” could mean that he always goes to France whenever he gets the chance or that France is his only destination whenever he travels.

A: It means France is closest to England at the Strait of Dover.

A: It has not hit me means I haven’t realized it, or I don’t believe it yet.

A: I live in France.
My aunt is from France.
France is a country in Europe.
I’m going to France soon.
France is an important country.

A: Were George and Maria in France?

A: "I told him that I was born in France" is more natural and well you could say "I told him that I had been born in France" almost sounds like you were then born somewhere else as well.

A: The first is used when finding out something for the first time that you did not know before. "I spent four years in Paris" "Oh, you lived in France, did you". The second implies you are seeking confirmation of a fact you suspected or knew already.

A: They're extremely similar, but the first one seems that she spoke good French because she was living in France at the time being spoken about, and the second one seems that she spoke good French because she lived in France BEFORE the time being spoken about.

Though the differences are very particular. There is technically a difference grammatically, but they can essentially be used interchangeably.

A: A: that is the reason you want to go to France
B: the period of time in which you want to go to France is spring break.
C: unnatural statement... if you include a pronoun e.g. Can i go to France on my spring break?
then it is the same as B

A: They all mean the same thing. :)

A: The first sentence is more proper. You usually don’t put “the” before “last year” or “next year”, the same applies for “week” and “month”

A: Schaue nach der Frage, um die Antwort zu sehen

A: I recently moved to France 🇫🇷

A: Schaue nach der Frage, um die Antwort zu sehen

A: I look forward to going to France and meeting you. Thank you for having read my letter.

A: France: I want to see Paris. One of my favorite writers, Maugham, always depicts the life of painters or writers who live in Paris. I think it will be a memorable place to travel to. I'm interested in visiting the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre to see the Mona Lisa. I also want to go to the castle of Versailles, which is 20 minutes from Paris by train.

A: "I found that there was a bit more precision (on foreign policy) even if I found that on the Israeli-Palestinian dossier it was very confused and worrying," Ayrault said of his meeting.

Makes more sense of what the headline means after you read the whole article. There's a few factors here: Foreign minister and policy itself is confused ( although it's impossbile for a non inanimate object ( position) to be confused. A better word would be a contradictory or unclear policy/ position

A: "I'm interested in France" is good! "I'm into..." is a natural phrase in English but does not make sense in the context of location, as it sounds like you are "in France."

I hope that makes sense.

A: Est-ce que je peux vous aider? Is what you will likely hear.
Pouvez-vous m'aider? And
Pouvez-vous me renseigner? Have a slightly different meaning. Aider is used if you need help, like asking to carry a box. Pouvez vous m'aider à porter la boîte. Renseigner could be used if you need information, like where a restaurant is. Pouvez vous me renseigné, je cherche le restaurant le plus proche.

A: I think that France played wonderfully, and that's why they were crowned with the victory.