Hi guys, can you please help me correct this text? Thank you

Recent actual text 4.6.

Should developing countries give job opportunities to knowledgeable people from developed countries, or conversely, should the jobs only be provided to the locals? There are divergent views on this matter.
On the one hand, there is no denying the fact that some people from poor countries, have a great deal qualifications as well as experience in the field they have studied. Nevertheless, many of them find difficult to have a job that is really challenging for them in their own country, inasmuch that developing countries have neither technological breakthroughs nor enough resources. For this reason, they are of the opinion that they could have the possibility to apply for a position in a country that can offer them better prospects. For instance, were a person to work in a wealthy country, it is highly likely that he would earn much better. In addition, his knowledge would be better employed on account that he could demonstrate that he would be a perfect asset to the company. What is more, were they to be endowed with some kind of talent, the company will be benefited and it will be a win-win situation.
Having said that, it stands to reason that the detractors deem that each country should guarantee first of all that the nationals have jobs. For them, what should be considered is that should an overseas be given a high-profile position, it is highly likely that a resident will be rejected. Furthermore, seldom do we see that developed countries provide students with a high standard education.
In conclusion, I would say that there is no doubt that more often than not poor countries are not in the position to give residents an ideal job in monetary and challenging terms. Notwithstanding, from my standpoint, guarantee good positions should be a liability of each country and only as a last resort should overseas being hired.

Should developing countries give job opportunities to knowledgeable people from developed countries, or conversely, should the jobs only be provided to the locals? There are divergent/different views/opinions on this matter.
On one hand, there is no denying the fact that some people from poor countries, have great qualifications as well as experience in the field they have studied. Nevertheless, many of them find it difficult to have a job that is really challenging for them in their own country, inasmuch/considering that developing countries have neither technological breakthroughs nor enough resources. For this reason, they are of the opinion that they could have the possibility to apply for a position in a country that can offer them better prospects. For instance, were a person to work in a wealthy country, it is highly likely that he would earn much better. In addition, his knowledge would be better employed on account that he could demonstrate that he would be a perfect asset to the company. What is more, were they to be endowed with some kind of talent, the company would be benefited and it would be a win-win situation.
All things considered, it stands to reason that the detractors deem that each country should guarantee the locals/nationals jobs. For them, what should be considered is that if an overseas be given a high-profile position, it is highly likely that a resident will be rejected. Furthermore, we rarely see that developed countries provide students with a high standard education.
In conclusion, I would say that there is no doubt that more often than not, poor countries are not in the position to give residents an ideal job in monetary and challenging terms. Notwithstanding, from my standpoint, guaranteed good positions should be a liability of each country and only as a last resort should overseas jobseekers be hired.


I tried to give different options on some words that were correct but could be changed :)