Question

Aktualisiert am 9 Apr 2020

6 Apr 2020

Koreanisch

Englisch (US)
Japanisch

Geschlossene Frage

Frage über Englisch (US)

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.

Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"?

Antworten

Khadijah111

9 Apr 2020

Favorisierte Antwort

Englisch (US)

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence

Diese Frage teilen

Copy URL

Khadijah111

6 Apr 2020

Englisch (US)

Yes for is necessary as it indicates the reduction is needed

Orchid11111

6 Apr 2020

Koreanisch

@Khadijah111 I just referred to an English dictionary and it says the verb "reduce" is a transitive verb. So I think the verb should be followed by an object without a preposition. I mean we don't say that we should reduce for infected cases.

Khadijah111

9 Apr 2020

Englisch (US)

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence

[Neuigkeiten] Hallo du! Die/derjenige, die/der eine Sprache lernt!

Möchten Sie wissen, wie Sie Ihre Sprachkenntnisse verbessern können❓ Alles, was Sie tun müssen, ist, Ihre Schreiben durch einen Muttersprachler korrigieren zu lassen!
Mit HiNative können Sie Ihre Schreiben kostenlos durch Muttersprachler korrigieren lassen ✍️✨.

Registrieren

Diese Frage teilen

Copy URL

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.

Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"?

Ähnliche Fragen

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"? Sehen Sie eine Übersetzung

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduceAt least that's how I saw the sentence

Yes for is necessary as it indicates the reduction is needed

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduceAt least that's how I saw the sentence

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.

Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"?

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence