Was ist der Unterschied zwischen which one is correct “ we are just 2 people who happened to have run into each other und or we are just 2 people who happen to have run into each other, also should i use run or ran und example could be when i met someone at the mall and i was telling someone else who asked a question that how did you guys meet ?

Question

Was ist der Unterschied zwischen which one is correct “ we are just 2 people who happened to have run into each other und or we are just 2 people who happen to have run into each other, also should i use run or ran  und example could be when i met someone at the mall and i was telling someone else who asked a question that how did you guys meet ?

HebrewDane · Answer

You can say "We are just two people who happened to run into each other" and that would sound OK.  
Yes, you can say "ran into" meaning you just happened to meet someone. Either someone you already know or someone you never met before. But often it would mean someone you know. 
"I ran into my friend at the mall so we had coffee together."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi If you wanted to say that you met someone you didn't know before like at the mall, or someplace, you could say "we met by chance at the mall" for example.
Like "How did you two meet?"  "We just met by chance one day at the mall."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, born and raised in the USA. And believe me. Most people make mistakes. It seems more noticeable these days than when I was younger. I find that even news people on TV or the radio sometimes use incorrect words today. Plus there is proper English that one learns in school and then the everyday form of English that people speak normally. We use a lot of slang. Often don't fully pronounce some words. I imagine it's the same in most languages.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi If you speak too perfectly people will wonder why. At least here. I'm serious in that so many people today speak very improper English. My mother was a school teacher plus I minored in English in college so I tend to be quite critical of people who don't speak our language correctly. It's frustrating.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I would say it is not correct or natural.  I should be "if she hadn't seen that" or perhaps "if she wouldn't have seen that" but as it's written is wrong. But it would not shock me to hear it said that way at all. As I mentioned people either don't learn correctly or simply don't bother speaking correctly quite often.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I know what you mean. And just when you think you've learned how to say something you hear a different way and get confused and frustrated. That's how it is with me learning Hebrew.  It's a process. You have to stick with it.

HebrewDane · Answer

I don't do Instagram.  I don't really do social media stuff.  I'm usually on this site at least once or twice a day. Feel free to ask me anything. You can use this same conversation also. I've done that with other people. Hope I can continue to help you.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi That would sound fine.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Sell the phone at the right price is correct. Or sell the phone for the right price is too. But when mentioning a dollar amount you need to say "Sell the phone FOR $500."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi If you wanted to tell someone to follow a person online you could say "follow them on this site" and then give the web address.  You could say at this site but this could also mean a physical site, like a park or other location. If that makes sense. As for username, I'm not exactly sure how one might say that. I'd probably say "Follow them with the username of XXXX" or something like that.

HebrewDane · Answer

It depends. If you are in the store looking at laptops and see one that says $200 you would say "this laptop costs $200."  If you already bought that laptop and someone asked you how much you paid for it you'd say "The laptop cost me $200."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, that would be fine. Or you could also say "they are idols to everyone" and it would mean the same thing.

HebrewDane · Answer

As for being in line you'd say "at the front of the line" or "at the head of the line" to mean someone is first in the line. If you said in the front of the line I guess it would be OK but it could be somewhat confusing. Because it could mean you have a line drawn on the ground or on the street, for example, and someone is standing in front of that line. Like he or she stepped over the line. Whereas if you said at the front of the line it would normally be understood the person is first in a line of people. Do you see the difference?
As for in the beginning or at the beginning let me think. I'll get back to you shortly. I want to come up with the best explanation.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi OK, I'll do my best. I found this explanation on Google.
"At the beginning is used to refer to the start or first part of something. It is usually followed by of. In the beginning means 'at first', and it usually suggests a contrast with a later situation. It is not usually followed by of."

The first book of the Christian Bible starts with "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." It refers to a beginning but doesn't necessarily imply an ending.  "In the beginning the company had only three employees and worked out of a garage. Now they are one of the largest companies in the world."  The company began and is till going on. 
At the beginning implies a start of something that comes before a later part or end. And you can use the word "of" to make sense. Such as "At the beginning of the book the main character was 5 years old."  "At the beginning of the school year the students were excited to learn."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi This is tricky. I think I would have said it similar to the way your friend did. "There hasn't existed such a realistic game like this before."  But it's hard to explain why.  I need to think about it. In the meantime you might Google the difference and see if any of the explanations help clarify it. I did but to be honest I didn't like the answers. They were confusing to me.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I think the best way is to give you some examples.

"There hadn't been any warning before the earthquake struck." (The event happened. It's now over. But before it happened there hadn't been any warning.)
"There hasn't been an earthquake here in 10 years." (The possibility of an earthquake still exists. But up till now there hasn't been one in 10 years.)

"He hadn't been to work in over a week." (He's been absent for over a week but today he came to work. So the period of absence is over.)
"He hasn't been to work in over a week." (He's been absent for over a week and he still has not shown up for work. The absence is still continuing.)

I hope this helps.

HebrewDane · Answer

I suppose you could say it either way if you wanted but for me saying "you wouldn't know" sounds better and that's what I'd say. If you said something like, after mentioning the player's name, "you won't know who that is" or "you won't know who I mean" because you don't watch football that would work also. But for the most part I think the first way is the best.

HebrewDane · Answer

Beside means next to or near to.  Besides means in addition to, regarding the question it would be other things besides that.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'd say meet me in my office. If you wanted to use "at" you could say "meet me at my office door" but in general you'd be in an office.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi If you mean he walked past you, meaning he continued beyond where you were you could say "He walked 5 feet past me."  Or "He walked 5 feet beyond me." Is that what you had in mind?

HebrewDane · Answer

You are "at" a game. So you could say that you were at the Barcelona game. That's good. Or if it's assumed the person knows what game you are talking about you could just say I was at the game.
"Were you at the game last night?"
"Do you mean the Barcelona game?  I was there and it was a great game."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I started to answer last evening but I got interrupted.
You could say either AT or IN for this context. I don't think there would be a problem. But there is often a subtle difference between the two. I'll try to explain.

If you say "in the beginning" it often implies that something started but hasn't really finished yet, or there is not a specific ending point. 
"In the beginning the company had only 3 employees but now they have 50."  (The company started at some point in time and it's still operating."
"In the beginning we got along well but after a year we started to drift apart."  (The couple started off well in their relationship but over time things changed. They may or may not have broken up yet.)

"At the beginning of the movie a tall man sat down in front of me and I couldn't see the screen."
(The movie started and then eventually ended. Like a book. Start>finish.)
"At the beginning of the school year the students were eager to learn."  (School year started and eventually it ended for summer break.)

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, to come to an understanding usually means a person does it with another person or a group of people. It's not something you would say about yourself. 
"My boss and I came to an understanding about my salary and he's going to give me a raise."
"My brother, sister, and I came to an understanding about caring for our elderly mother. We will each help out one day a week."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You would say he left his phone at his house. If he left it inside something, like a briefcase, you could say he left his phone in his briefcase at his house.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi No. You come to an understanding. You don't come to understanding. You need the AN.

HebrewDane · Answer

You can say someone's action can lead to consequences. It's not a one-for one concept. A single action that someone makes could lead to more than one consequence. It could affect other people or change or affect other situations. 
There is an expression that every actions has consequences. Whether they be good one or bad ones. So you could say someone's actions (in plural) can lead to to consequences. Or can have consequences. So using it in the plural form is fine if it fits the context better.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi No. You need the an. It doesn't make sense without it.
You can also say reach an understanding. But still need the an.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I don't think people would say action in the singular form like this. Unless you said "his action could have a consequence" but that isn't natural.  Actions have consequences. It only works in plural.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi First of all using "wanna" is not really correct although people say it often. it should be "want to" but you'll hear wanna a lot. 
But to answer your question you can say "I was wondering if you'd like to come to the party tonight?"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi  You'd say "do you know how we became friends?" if you are speaking to someone who's been a friend for a long time and you are reminiscing about how you originally began the friendship, for example. 
To say "made friends" means the actual way someone makes friends. 
For example, if someone moved to a totally different state or city and didn't know anyone someone might ask "How did you make friends after you moved?" And he/she could reply, "I made friends at school and on social networking sites."

HebrewDane · Answer

You would probably hear it both ways. Name or names. But technically it should be names because there are two, or more, people involved.  But if you said "they didn't know each other's name" nobody would care. It would work too.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It sounds OK. It would not be strange to hear someone say that.  I'd probably say something like "what a coincidence that we ran into each other" but that's just how I talk.

HebrewDane · Answer

It would be time of day.  Or at this time of day.  You could say time of the day as well. 
"It's awfully hot for this time of day."  This could imply a more general time during the day. Not a specific time.
"The mailman always comes at this time of the day."  This could imply a specific time, like at 2 in the afternoon, for example. 
But either one is fine.

HebrewDane · Answer

If you are saying it almost like a question to yourself you would say, "I can do that now but would I have been able to do it two years ago?"
If you were saying it more like a statement of fact you could say, "Now I can do it but two years ago I couldn't."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, you can use mine in this way.  However I'd change the wording a bit.
You could say "It's his secret and mine" or "It's a secret between us" or "It's our own secret" and I'm sure you follow what I mean. As for using mine you can say things like, "The idea was mine but he took credit for it."  Just as another example.

HebrewDane · Answer

The first one would be best. The second one not so much.  
You could also say, "Before yesterday (or until yesterday) I hadn't spoken to my agent in a month."

HebrewDane · Answer

Someone else's car is correct.  You could say someone's car but without the else's too.
"I grabbed someone else's coat by mistake at work today."
"I took someone's coat today at work but it wasn't mine."

HebrewDane · Answer

You'd say "I played in the World Cup" because it's inferred that you mean the World Cup game. Or series of games. Here we enjoy baseball and the championship at the end of the season is called the World Series. It's a best out of 7 tournament. You would say, for example, "the New York Yankees played in the World Series."

HebrewDane · Answer

Firstly we spell it favorite here. They add the "u" in the UK and other places I think. No big deal though.
Technically if you say "my most favorite" it infers that you mean one particular thing so thing in the singular would be correct. If you were speaking about more than one thing, but still favorites, you would say favorite things.  But some people might say most favorite things too. So in everyday speech you'd here it either way.  It's one of those things that people say even if it might not be grammatically correct.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, you can say it that way.  But I'd suggest this. You could leave out repeating the second "they are" as it is inferred in the first part. 
"They are much more of a hassle than a help."  And that would be less wordy.  You could also say, "They are more of a hassle than a help." and still get the same idea across.

HebrewDane · Answer

The best way to look at it is this.  For example, let's do the loan. For 1 million dollars. If you say that it's a million-dollar loan the word dollar is part of a two-word phrase "million-dollar" so you don't use the "s" at the end  It would be like a two-way street. A street where traffic goes two ways. The hyphenated two words change the need for an "s" if that makes sense. 
The plane cost a million dollars. It's a million-dollar plane.
The necklace cost a thousand dollars. It's a thousand-dollar necklace.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, in both cases you need to use the plural, Times.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You would say you were at an event. However, regarding a wedding. They have a term for people who actually participate in a wedding ceremony. Like bridesmaids and the best man, etc. They call it being "in the wedding party" so in that case you have to use "in" instead. 
For example. "I was at a wedding last weekend. My sister was in the wedding party."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You would use "at" in this context.
"At 1000 dollars I felt the computer was too expensive."
"At only 50 dollars I thought it was a bargain for the new chair."

HebrewDane · Answer

You wouldn't say anything like I am at the top in Europe. You can say I'm number one (in something) such as "I'm number one in my class at school."  Or "I'm number one in sales at work."
If you were talking about someone who is a sports figure, say a tennis player, you could say "He/she is the top tennis player in the world."  Or "the top tennis player in the United States."  Then you can use the word top. I hope this helps.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You'd say 7 dollars a pair.  If something costs more than one dollar you need to say dollars. If not you would say, for example, "Every item on the sales table is one dollar each."

HebrewDane · Answer

This area is very lively. That's why I live on this street.
You could also say "this neighborhood" or "this part of town"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You are correct. It should be rich people's houses.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I cannot answer this one. I have no idea what this is. Can you provide a sentence or some context?

HebrewDane · Answer

I'm still not quite sure what you mean. Is the computer itself all white? Or a program/page on the computer all white?  Regardless, let's say it's a room. You have a room in your house that you want to redecorate. You paint the walls white. You buy white furniture. You put down a white carpet and put up white curtains. It's all white. You would say it's a white-themed room. I hope that helps you.

HebrewDane · Answer

Well, in the example sentence you gave I'd use the word until.  It sounds more natural to me. But I guess technically both words mean the same. So you could use either one. I think it's more of a preference and how it sounds. For example:
"I can hardly wait till my birthday."
"When is your birthday?"
"It's not until the end of the month."
What I mean is that I'd use those words in this conversation only because it would sound right to my ear but you could use either word.

HebrewDane · Answer

Fish is one of those animal names that is the same in singular and plural. Like deer. One is deer. More than one is deer. Fish is one. Fish is also more than one.
So if you were speaking about one fish or many fish it is still "fish"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I would say yes.  You could express it two ways.  A room with a cartoon theme or a cartoon-themed room.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi No problem.  Here goes.....
Thursdays.  For example: "I work late on Thursdays."  This means that on each Thursday of every week I work late. It's simply the plural for Thursday.
On Thursday.  For example: A friend and I are planning to go shopping together sometime this week. "What day would you like to go shopping?"  "How about Thursday?"  This means that on the coming Thursday of this week we will go shopping. If we were planning it for the following week, as in next week, it would be, "How about next Thursday?"  And if we were discussing something that happened last week it would be, "It was last Thursday."
On a Thursday.  For example: I am telling someone about when I was born. I don't know the time of day or night but I do know what day of the week it was.  "I don't know the time but I do know it was on a Thursday."  So whatever day it was way back when I was born, years ago, it happened on a Thursday. 
I hope this helps.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I sometimes go overboard with my answers but I try to be as clear and detailed as possible. Not a problem. I'm glad I can help.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You could say "in a special session..." or "during a special session..." if you wanted. They would not be incorrect. At a special session is OK too but of the three I'd say "during" sounds the most natural. At least that's what I'd probably say.  For situations like this there is a lot of leeway as to which word to use. As long as they make sense.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi To be honest I don't think it would matter much which word you used. They'd both be understood. But this is how I look at it. To be welcomed makes me think more of an actual greeting when someone is coming to your house or you are meeting someone.  "They welcomed the new guest into their home."  "I was warmly welcomed at the door."  More of a specific event.  Used like a verb I guess.
To feel welcome means how you feel and how you are treated when a guest of someone. Or are new to a certain place or situation. Or are invited to an event. 
"You're welcome to join us tomorrow."
 "She didn't feel welcome at the party"
Also there is the standard reply when someone says "Thank you" to a person. You could answer, "You're welcome."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'm not exactly sure what you mean this time. 
Maybe something like this?  I am given the choice of three things. Say things to choose to eat at a restaurant.  Steak, spaghetti, or pot roast.  You could say, "I would choose the first one." or "I choose the third one."  Is that what you had in mind?

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Actually welcomed is the action. Welcome is the feeling. You would feel welcome if someone welcomed you into their home, for example. But to be honest nobody would think it wrong if you used welcomed in place of welcome. It's a fine line I'd say and people are less rigid about following specific rules in English these days. 
So to specifically answer what you asked. You could say you feel welcome and you felt welcome. Why? Because someone welcomed you or someone is welcoming you into their house or a certain place. I hope this makes sense. I wouldn't fuss too much over this concept. Either one would work in daily speech. I do think your knowledge is quite good anyway. You impress me with your questions....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You ask such interesting and intelligent questions. To be honest many of the questions I read on HiNative are somewhat vague and often hard to answer. 
Anyway, I'd say that technically the word "people" really isn't simply the plural for "person" in a sense. People is more of a general term for humans, or humankind. Persons would be considered the plural but it is only used in certain instances. For example: Say you saw a news story about a crime that was committed. The police might have someone in mind as a suspect. They'd say, "The police have a person of interest they are looking at."  If there were more than one suspect they might say, "The police have several persons of interest they are looking at."  
The funny thing is, though, that regarding your question about "he's one of the nicest __ I've ever known." you wouldn't normally persons although it would not be incorrect if you did. People would say, "He's one of the nicest people I've ever known." although you'd also say, "He's the nicest person I've ever known."
So for the most part it's person for one individual and people for more than one but there are some times when persons can be used instead. I know this gets complicated but I try to offer you as much detail as I can.  My name is Dane, btw.

HebrewDane · Answer

It would be one year's time, almost like it's a possessive. Similar expressions would be:
Two weeks' notice
Ten dollars' worth

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I just thought of another good example of when you would use the word "person" if you don't mind. Say, for example, you were at the airport getting ready to pass through the metal detector. The security guy might ask you, "Do you have anything metal on your person?" where person here means your actual physical body.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi As I said the word person isn't used all that much and it does really depend on the context.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Do you mean you have two weeks to complete the job or assignment? If that's the case you could say, "My boss gave me a job assignment and said I have two weeks to complete it." 
Or if you want to stick with the two-weeks' notice theme. 
"My boss gave me two-weeks' notice to finish the job he assigned me."
However let me point this out.  Saying something like "two-weeks' notice" is normally used in a different way. For example, if I was deciding to quit my job, or if I was planning to put in for vacation time at work, I might have to give my employer two-weeks' notice. Meaning I have to let him/her know at least two weeks ahead of time.
Or if I wanted to move to a different apartment and had to let my current landlord know I might have to give them three-weeks' notice before moving. Or something like that. 
In the case of your boss giving you a new job task it would be better to use the word "deadline" I think.
My boss gave me some work to do with a two-week deadline to complete it.  I hope it makes sense. 
"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi They are both the same and can be used interchangeably.  I think that "half an hour" is actually a shorter version of "half of an hour" and "half hour" is a shorter version of that. Both are fine. I use them both all the time.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You ask things that make me think. And that's a good thing. When people speak their native language they just say it without really thinking about why or how.  Let me think here.....
I don't know of a rule that you have to use a plural after "any" because often you don't need to or can't because it would not make sense. In the example you give, however, either the singular or plural works. But that won't be the case all the time.
"i don't have any time to help you right now."  (any times would not sound right)
"I don't have any idea."  
"I don't have any fruit for my salad."

I think this is a case where if it doesn't sound right when you say it, then it's not right. Maybe not a specific rule to follow though.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I wish I did have some advice but you sound a lot like me. I'm self-learning Hebrew. And I tend to overthink or sometimes stress about a small thing that I encounter that simply doesn't make sense to me. Sometimes if I ask a question on this site, on the Hebrew forum, I get a simple answer that helps clear up my confusion or I'll get advice that I'm making too much out of something that's not that big of a deal. So I guess we are in the same boat.
That said, I think being fussy and detail-oriented when learning a language is a good trait. I want to not only learn the words, verbs, conjugations, etc. but really understand the concepts, the rules, the exceptions. Get a feel in my head for how they speak. I think that is something perhaps harder to achieve but well worth the effort. I admire your inquisitiveness.

HebrewDane · Answer

The correct way is "Jack and I could be the judges."  One easy way to make sure you are using the right one is to simply say to yourself "would I work if it was a single thing?"  Meaning, in this case, you would know right away if you said, "Me could be a judge" that it was wrong. If you said to yourself, "I could be a judge" it sounds right. So Jack and I is correct.
"Me" is used when you (I) is the object form.  Example, "Jack asked me if we could be judges. I agreed and now Jack and I are judges."  Do you see the difference?  It's always been hard for me to explain this to others and sometimes to myself....
And as for the question about people getting it wrong. Yes, many people get this wrong. It's not uncommon to hear I and me mixed up.  In fact in many ways people are getting worse and worse in speaking correct English. I notice sometimes even news reporters or other journalists will speak incorrectly.  It is troubling to me.

HebrewDane · Answer

It is quite flexible. If you mean reservation(s) for a place, like a restaurant, you'd say "I got reservations for the restaurant." Or "at the restaurant." Either one would work. It would be the same basically for any specific place, like a hotel for example. "I got reservations for the hotel" or "at the hotel."
However you might refer to the place you booked the reservations but they are for someplace or something else.  For example, "I booked reservations for the tour at the hotel." Meaning while at the hotel I booked reservations for the tour we are taking of the city. So using "at" can sometimes mean the place where you made the reservations but not always for the place where you will use them. Hope this makes sense. 
You could also say "booked" instead of got reservations.  "I booked a room at the hotel." or "I booked a table at the restaurant."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It means someone is asking about a certain car and wonders who it belongs to or who will be getting it. Say, for example, you buy a new car at the dealership. You are supposed to go pick it up on a certain day. Earlier that day they are getting the car ready and prepped for pick-up. Someone may ask, "Who is this car for?" meaning who will be coming to pick it up?

Who's is just short for who is.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I don't know if I already answered this or not. I lost track. 
Really, it would not matter which one you used. Either one is fine and would be understood and deemed correct.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It's simply a matter of singular vs. plural. 
A new set of reforms means one new set that has reforms in it.  One set but there could be more than one reform. 
New sets of reforms means more than one set. And in each of these sets there could be more than one reform. 
So new set of reforms is singular. For set.
New sets of reforms is plural.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I tried to answer this yesterday but after I got the response all typed my internet went out. They did not get it fixed till late last night. So I'm trying again now.
Yes, saying the best of or the worst of is commonly used.  
I don't know if you are familiar with the English author Charles Dickens. One of his books is entitled "A Tale of Two Cities."  It's about the French Revolution. Anyway the opening lines in the book, which are often quoted, go like this: "It was the best of times. It was the worst of times."
Here are some examples:
The best kinds of food are the kinds I can prepare easily.
The worst kind of movie is a horror film.

Also we often say, "The best of luck to you" to wish someone luck or success. Or just, "Best of luck!" 
Hope this helps.

HebrewDane · Answer

Yes, there is no problem using "get" after "doesn't" at all. 
"It doesn't get any easier, believe me...."
"If it doesn't get better in a day or two call me and I'll prescribe something else."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You could actually use either one.  If you use the singular you could emphasize the phrase like this if you wanted. " Even the strongest swimmer in the world could not get across the bay."   Or you could be more general and say "Even the strongest swimmers could not make it across the bay."  Both would work.

HebrewDane · Answer

Yes. In fact I'd probably say it the way you suggest.  Either way would be correct but it's inferred, in your example, that he is referring to her hair so it's not really necessary to say "hair" again.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, correct.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, this is correct also. I read the other question first.

HebrewDane · Answer

I'm not exactly sure about the examples you have given.  If I change them a bit I can explain better.
It is a two-hour drive.  You use the "a' and the singular hour. Not hours. If you wrote it differently as in "The drive takes two hours." then you would use plural "hours."
It is a ten-question test.  Again, you'd use "a" and singular "test" here. If you wrote it "The test has ten questions" then you'd use the plural. I hope this makes sense.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You wouldn't say "the care was going at high speeds."  
"The car was going at a very high speed" is correct.  Or you could say "The car was traveling at a high rate of speed."  Or the best way is "The car was speeding."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi IF you were talking about more than one car going fast. For example:
"At a NASCAR race the cars go at very high speeds."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes. It's correct. You can leave out the "got" though.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, it depends on what you are trying to say. Both are OK but mean something a bit different. 
At the end of the day means just that. At day's end I am still hopeful. Also at the end of the day can be used more figuratively or less specifically.  
"As long as I feel satisfied at the end of the day I'm happy."  This could mean at the end of a specific day, like today. Or just in general. At the end of the day in a general sense.

In the end is more general too. Almost like the previous example used in a general sense. However in the end can refer to the end of anything. Not just a day. 
"In the end I discovered I'd made a serious mistake."  We really don't know in the end of what but just in the end of whatever circumstance or experience being referred to.

So basically you can use either example you wrote.  It would depend, though, on what you wanted to express.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Sorry I did not respond sooner.
I completely understand what you mean. I do the same thing with my Hebrew studies. I suppose it might seem silly to memorize phrases but to be honest I think it's helped me. I find that down the line I might read or hear a similar phrase and understand it, or I may encounter a different sentence that has a verb or word from the memorized phrase and it helps me to better understand the new sentence. 
I would not do this as my main form of language study, though. I do video lessons and flashcards.  It's often on the flashcards that I encounter phrases that I don't understand at first but memorize for some benefit later on.
Just find a good balance between regular study and memorization and then I think you'll benefit from both.
BTW, the fact that you can so clearly and correctly even ask a question such as this tells me that your level of English proficiency is quite high.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I agree. No matter what language I think the process is similar. Learning by yourself is also extra difficult. I'm glad I have been able to help you out.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I supposed either one would be acceptable but as for me I'd say 'the same color suit.'   A way of saying a suit of the same color.  
Also if a guy is wearing a suit that is a bright or different color among a group of other men wearing plain gray or brown suits, for example, then you could say "The man in the colored suit" referring to that guy because his suit is of a color and not plain. So in this example colored would work better. But saying the same color as someone else's suit I'd use color.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi There really is no difference in meaning. It's simply two ways of saying the same thing.  The only difference I can think of is perhaps this.
If I was eating a piece of pie right now and I liked it more than any other in the past I could say, "This is the best pie I have ever had!"
If I was comparing this pie to a piece I ate years ago that was better than the current one I could say, "That was the best pie I ever had."
But basically you can say either one.

HebrewDane · Answer

It depends on how you want to say it. The first way, "For 100 years this tradition has been going on."  This works well. But if you use "since" you have to change it and actually mention the year. For example. "The tradition has been going on since 1921.  100 years ago."
Look at it this way too. "The tradition has been going on for 2 years."  Or, "The tradition has been going on since 2019."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, it sounds native. You can say it either way though. But the first way is something people would say.  You could also say "I never got a corona test."

HebrewDane · Answer

Because you are referring to "one of" it is singular. So you would use "has been spying"
"One of my friends has been asking about you."
If you were referring to more than one you would say, "Both of your sisters have been spying on us."

HebrewDane · Answer

In general I would use "on a different level" such as if you were talking about Ronaldo being more advanced in, say, studying a new language.
I'm learning Spanish, but compared to Ronaldo he's on a whole different level."
I guess you could say "at a different level" and it would not be wrong but if I was speaking I'd use "on" myself.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It's funny you ask this question because it's one example of what irritates me as to how most people speak incorrectly today. 
Technically the second sentence is correct. Everyone is a plural concept word. So hearts needs to be plural to match.  However, I hear many, many people say it the first way.  Almost like we all have one, giant shared heart. Which we don't.  If you wanted to correctly use the singular version you could say, "that moment touched each person's heart."  And that would work fine. So the bottom line is you could say it either way and nobody would think any different. The second way is how I say it.  But I may be in the minority on this....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi `I haven't forgotten you. I've just not been online much lately. I'll get to your questions now.
The correct way is "it's the only sector of government that is not corrupt."
If you wanted to use corrupted you'd have to show a result that perhaps the corrupt government caused. Such as, "The government has corrupted the process of legislation in our system."

HebrewDane · Answer

Yes, you would say 5 meters. Seeing that it's plural.
Just to mention though. And I hope I don't confuse you with too much information sometimes. There are people here, in certain states and certain regions, who do tend to leave the "s" off the end even though it's a plural word. Like he/she might say, "The store is five mile down the road."  But this is not real common nor is it standard English.

HebrewDane · Answer

You wouldn't really say either one to be honest. I'll try to explain how we'd use the word "daytime" or even "nighttime" if I may.
You can say "the daytime" in certain contexts. Or even just "daytime" really. For example.
"I only work daytime hours at my new job."
"In the daytime, when it's sunny, I like to spend time outdoors."
"I woke up late and discovered it was already daytime."

I hope this helps.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi To be honest I think saying "the olden days" or "the olden times" is probably not something younger people would say today. I'm just guessing here. People from my generation say it. It's just something I grew up hearing and saying. I don't think anyone would care if you said it today but I'm not sure it's as common as it was back then.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I tried to answer this yesterday but sometimes my answers get too complicated. So here is a link that explains it quite good. I use the checking tool that it mentions all the time. Hope it helps.
https://www.kaplaninternational.com/blog/learning-languages/eng/quick-english-when-to-use-i-and-me

HebrewDane · Answer

To me I'd use in the winter/summer if I was trying to say that I like to plant flowers in the summer. Or I like to ski in the winter. If you use the plural (winters/summers) I'd recommend using it like this. 
"The winters are very cold here."  "The summers are quite mild where I live."
Or you can use "every" and say something like "Every winter I go skiing." or "Every summer I like to go swimming at the lake."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You can still say "olden days" if you want. Or say "in the old days."  It seems now there is a popular expression that means the same which is "back in the day." People use it often. Also you can say "in times past" or "years ago" or something like that. You have a lot of choices here....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Who and whom are pretty much for humans. If you are referring to something other than a person you should say "that" instead.  "My dog that I love the most."

HebrewDane · Answer

Saying everyone is like saying "each one" in a way. So I'd use "everyone's name" like "I kept everyone's name, address, and Social Security number anonymous."
If you said something like "I kept all their names anonymous" then you can use the plural for name.

HebrewDane · Answer

Yes. We'd not say "as am I" in modern speech.  You could answer, though, "just like me" or "just as I am" if you wanted. They would mean the same as "as am I."  You could also switch it around and say "as I am" and that would be OK too.

HebrewDane · Answer

Not really. You'd say "two-day" weekend. Which is rather normal seeing that weekends are basically two days anyway. SAturday and Sunday.  If there is a holiday, say on the Monday after the weekend, then you'd say it's a long weekend. Or a three-day weekend including the extra day off.

HebrewDane · Answer

You could really say it either way. Both would be understood and sound OK.  However, if I said it I'd probably say the first way. "I really wish he would have scored."

HebrewDane · Answer

I am not quite sure I understand the last part of your question. But as for the rest. Anytime you can use "should" in a statement you could also change it to a question by putting the "should" at the beginning, like you mentioned. For example:
At a baseball game:  "He should have thrown the ball to second base instead of first."
                                  "Should he have thrown the ball to second base instead of first?"
A long line at the ticket booth for a movie:
                                  "We should have arrived earlier to avoid the crowd."
                                  "Should we have arrived earlier to avoid the crowd?"
Of course it would make more sense as part of a conversation and not just separate sentences. But I think you get what I mean. Actually in most conversations the question version would come first and then the statement (reply) version.

HebrewDane · Answer

Yes. That's just how you'd say it. Or you could say "he lived in the 19th century" which is the same thing.

HebrewDane · Answer

It depends on what you mean, basically. The word level can mean more than one thing. Regarding a building or structure.  If something is level it means it's not tipped to one side or the other. Say you are hanging a picture on the wall. You want it to hang straight. You don't want it to be crooked. So you would try to make it level. Make it hang straight across horizontally.  The same can be said for a building or a part of a structure. The building needs to be level on the ground upon which it sits. A floor in a building needs to be level. A door frame needs to be level, etc. 
However you can also say a building should be leveled or needs to be leveled, or was leveled and it means to be torn down. To be demolished. So say there is an old building on your street that is falling apart. Nobody lives there or uses it. The city might declare the building should be leveled. Torn down. 
Or say there is a tornado that moves through your neighborhood. Several homes and/or buildings were destroyed. You could say that the tornado leveled several structures. 
But to respond specifically to your question if you use level to mean not crooked you would just say the building should be level with the ground. Use level and not leveled.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I think sometimes I get carried away with my answers. But I try to make things clear for you and give you examples to help you understand. As for level, there is another meaning that is commonly used. Nothing to do with buildings, though. If I ask someone a question and I want an very honest answer, no matter how hurtful or upsetting the answer might be, I could say, "Please level with me." Meaning please tell me the truth. Don't make things sound better than they really are.
I go to the doctor and he discovers I have a serious illness that might cause me to die. I ask the doctor how much longer I will live. "Doc, level with me. How much longer will I live?"
So keep this in mind when using the word level.

HebrewDane · Answer

Yes. A picture taken 10 years ago would be a picture that is a decade old, or a decade-old picture.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Quresh I assume the person meant that the Youtuber should make another video about what he does at night.  So I guess you could say night routine but it would be better to say "nightly routine" meaning the routine done each night (nightly) as would be the same for what he does during the day. "daily routine"
As for "been so long we have seen one" this needs to be changed as well. You would say it like "it's been so long since we have seen one" meaning it's been a long time since the guy made and posted a video on that topic. 
You can use this type of expression in a lot of ways.  For example say you it had been many years since you had seen an old friend from childhood.  You could say, "It's been so long since I've seen him/her."
You are talking to someone about going out to eat at a restaurant. You might suggest an Italian restaurant. "I'd like to eat there. It's been so long since we've gone there."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi This one I'm not quite sure about. Without more context. But I assume it's trying to say something like you are at work and you hope to be done with work by 11am.  Is this correct?
You could just say, 'I'm hoping to be done by 11."  Or "I hope to be finished by 11" or "I should be done by 11" . I hope this is helpful.

HebrewDane · Answer

You are pretty close.  Firstly, you do have to say 1 million dollars.  The plural ending is referring to the million and not the 1. You could say "a million dollars" also and it needs the same plural ending.
Now for the other part.  It would be best to say it one of the two following ways. 
"Even if Barcelona offers him 1 million dollars he still won't come."
"Even if Barcelona offered him 1 million dollars he still wouldn't come."
They mean the same thing but there is a slightly different nuance in either sentence. 
Offered+wouldn't
Offers + won't

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Glad to help

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'm not sure what you mean with this one.  Saying you have to go for tuition(s) is not correct. Do you mean that you have to go someplace to pay tuition, say for college?
If this is the case you'd say it just like that. "I have to go tomorrow to pay my tuition" and you'd use the singular.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi That doesn't really make sense.  Tuition is what you pay to attend school. Normally college but it can also apply to private schools or other paid schools. 
So I am not sure what it is you are trying to express. Can you try again perhaps?

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Sorry it has taken so long to reply. There was a death in the family and I've been preoccupied with that.
I did not know that tuition meant something else in a different country. It's very interesting to learn this.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I think I understand what your question is. Here's how it should be....
"In that book, in one place, it said that he likes her.  But in another place it said that he liked her friend."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I am so glad to hear from you. I wondered if something happened and I have to admit I was worried. Ask me anything. I'm always glad to help. And glad to hear you are OK.

HebrewDane · Answer

As for a riot or protest I think saying "in the street or in the streets, if more than one street is involved, would sound best. You could use on the street in a context like "there was a burned-out car on the street after the protest."
You wouldn't really use "at" except something like "at street level" which means on the level of the building that is on the street, or opens up onto the street. Example: The subway station was very large and had several exits on street level."
As for something like lack of trees, or whatever, you could say "streets" in plural.  
The streets of the city were wide and tree-lined.
The city streets were narrow and winding.

HebrewDane · Answer

Really either way is OK. I think it's probably a matter of preference. As long as him/me is the correct choice and not he/I.  So if you said it either way nobody would notice I doubt. 
Just to add this. Remember that there is the correct and grammatical way of speaking and then there is the common, daily, casual way that most natives speak in everyday situations. And it's not always the correct way. I always stress that it's best to learn the correct way first and then it's OK to learn the slang/common way that natives use

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In the first is used to begin a list, perhaps, of things you want to say. Or to explain.
"Mom, can I go to the mall on Saturday?"
"No, you cannot. In the first place you don't have any money to spend. In the second place you promised your dad you would cut the grass."      This is the sort of situation where you might use "in the first place."

As for what you are asking it's a bit different.  IF someone won a race you'd say he "was in first place" or "finished in first place" and the guy from another school "was in second place" etc.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In this case it has to be "you and I" because of the type of sentence. What I try to do to make sure I'm using the right words is say it a different way as a test. 
"those people speak better than you speak."  (this sounds correct)  "those people speak better than me speak."  (This does not sound correct.)  So then I'd try "those people speak better than I speak" (This sounds correct.
So the correct original sentence would be "Those people speak better English than you and I."

HebrewDane · Answer

Well, it is common that people would say "Those people speak English better than me" but in actuality they are saying "Those people speak English better than me do" and that isn't really correct. Even though people speak this way much of the time.  If you say "Those people speak English better than I" it's really saying "better than I do" which does sound correct when you look at it that way.
Another common example. If I knock on your door and you ask "Who is it?" I'd probably answer "It's me" even though it's not grammatically correct. You should say, "It is I" but that sounds so odd that most people would never speak that way. 
So the bottom line is I always advise people learning English, or any other language, to learn the correct speech, grammar, usage first and then they can branch out and learn how natives speak in daily conversation.

HebrewDane · Answer

I understand what you mean and I'm always glad to help.  Firstly, the expression we use is "to clear up confusion."  Just to point that out. 
Now for the rest....
IF you want to express how good Ronaldo is you would say, "He's one of the best PLAYERS in the world."  He's being compared to other players, either past or present perhaps. Or to players that a person has seen. "He's one of the best players I've ever seen."
IF you want to express that he's the one and only best player ever then you can say, "He's the best player in the world."  Or, "He's the best player I've ever seen."
So I guess the rule would be that if you are comparing him to other players, and out of those players he's one of the best, then you would say "players" but if you are saying there is nobody better or if there was never a single person better than he is, then you'd say "player." He's not being compared to others but singled out as being the best of all.
He's one of the best players in the league.
He's the best player in the world.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You have to use "she and I" or "he and I" are going.  My trick for which one to use is this. Just leave out the "I" and say the other word and then is going.  Like this: Her is going? Him is going?  You can tell this doesn't sound right. So that tells you that she and he is correct. "He is going" and "She is going" sound correct. Therefore "She and I are going" and "He and I are going" is correct.

If you use her or him you have to say it this way.  "I am going with him" or "I am going with her"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi We spell the word "flavor" here in the USA. Anyway, you would say, "My favorite flavor of ice cream is chocolate."
IF you wanted to use flavored you could say something like, "I like to drink flavored bottled water after I work out at the gym. I like lemon the best."
Or regarding ice cream you could just say, "I like chocolate-flavored ice cream" if you wanted.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Sorry, I hit send too early.  I wanted to say that normally we say chocolate ice cream, or whatever flavor you want.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I would most likely say "each other's phone" because using the word "each" lends itself more to a singular concept. Each person has one phone. If you said "check each other's phones" it wouldn't be wrong. But it could also mean that each person has more than one phone. So I'd check your phones and you'd check my phones. I hope this makes sense.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I understand completely.  I know you read my replies. And I look forward to reading your newest questions. I just hope I've provided some quality answers so far.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I think having a native speaker is the best way to learn. Someone who can explain things in detail. Information that is hard to get in formal lessons or online searches. Believe me I've found this out for myself. Trying to learn Hebrew on my own. Although I have gotten some good help on this site from other native Hebrew speakers.

HebrewDane · Answer

If you don't add the "a" and say a day of the week it normally refers to a specific day that is coming up.  
"I'm leaving on vacation next Friday." (Next week Friday)
"I don't have to work on Monday."

If you put the "a" in it's almost like using "any" and means on any particular day of the week but not really specific.

"Traffic is usually worse on a Monday or on a Friday."
"I usually go grocery shopping on a Wednesday because there are more things on sale."

You can also express this, for the most part, by just sayin the name of the day in plural.
"Traffic is usually worse on Mondays and Fridays."
"I like to shop on Wednesdays because there are more things on sale."

HebrewDane · Answer

I also hear people say it both ways.  I don't think it matters which way you say it.  A Muslim, or just Muslim.  You could even use agnostic as an example.  "I'm an agnostic" or "I am agnostic" and they both make sense.

HebrewDane · Answer

IF you mean the night that is coming at the end of today you would say "I have to go to dinner tonight."
As for when to use "at night" or "in the night" I can try to explain. 
At night is sort of general. Referring to anytime after it gets dark and before dawn the next morning. 
"It is very quiet at night in my neighborhood."
"At night I can see the stars in the sky."

In the night is a bit harder to explain. It would refer to a more specific night. Not just night in general.
"In the night I heard a loud noise that woke me up."
"I got sick in the night and had to vomit."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi For some reason people often do something similar. When referring to more than one person they still use the singular. I hear it a lot. And even though it's common I don't think it's correct to do so.  So in your example ourselves is the correct word. If it was just one person he/she would say "I'll discover the place by myself"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Your questions often challenge me and make me think. I did find this on Google but it's not as clear an answer as I'd hoped for.

"Both are grammatically correct. However known to is idiomatic and included in Oxford Dictionaries' examples:
Recognized, familiar, or within the scope of knowledge:
plants little known to western science.

Known by in a passive construction such as that, although not incorrect, is definitely awkward. The passive voice is used when the agent is immaterial and omissible: "The facts are known." If the facts are known by us, then the passive-voice construction is unnecessary: "We know the facts." Subverting the use of the passive voice by tacking "by us" on the end is what makes it awkward.
Known to is an idiomatic set phrase and not a passive construction."

Now for my thoughts.  "He is known by many people"  or "He is known to be an honest person."  OR even "He is known for his honesty and integrity."  
So there is another word, for, that can be used as well.

According to the Google reference both "to" and "by" can be used and are grammatically correct. But I am not sure if both would always sound right depending on the context. 
I wish I could  be more definite on this. It's a tricky situation I guess.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I try to answer correctly and in detail. But I've learned that so often a native speaker like myself sometimes doesn't even think about, or realize, why certain things are said the way they are. It's just how it is, I guess. I'm sure it's the same with other languages too. You've asked questions that often make me think. Make me figure out why we say things like we do. I think I too have learned a few things.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You are correct in saying that this is incorrect. And I agree that it's often hard to figure out which pronouns to use. Even for natives. And believe me when I say that many people, including myself sometimes, get it wrong.
What I try to do is run a little test to see what sounds right. In this example try asking if this sounds right.  "Me went to school." or "Him went to school" and it is easier to see that they don't sound right. So it would be correct to say "you and I and he" went to the same school. Try the test now.  "I went to school" and "He went to school" and this sounds better. It's the only way sometimes that I can check myself to figure out the right word to use.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It's confusing even to me at times. Believe me.  I often get mixed up with who and whom as well. 
And yes, it is correct to say "between me and him" or "between him and me."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You could arrange in any order. It would not matter. Although if you started with "I" it might sound a bit odd.  In fact I think the way you mentioned - you and he and I -  sounds the best.

HebrewDane · Answer

The comma would not matter or change the correct usage.  Remember the little test I mentioned before.  "Me eat dinner" or "I eat dinner" and you can tell that you need to use Jack and I.  Regardless of other punctuation.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It would be "everyone is on their phone these days" even though I guess technically it would be his/her phone. But nobody says it that way although it might be written that way.  Think of everybody as "each body" and everyone as "each one" to help clarify the singularity.  I know it's hard sometimes though. And many people probably wouldn't notice if you said it differently. We are getting rather sloppy with our speech these days.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi  I never really thought about how we say dates here. Although I do know that other countries tend to change the order that we use. Meaning we would write 6/25/22 for June 25th, 2022 but others do it 25/06/22.  The day comes first and then the month.
I guess people could use the cardinal numbers instead. One example is if someone asks my birthdate. Like when I go to the doctor they might ask my birthdate to verify who I am.  In that case I would say November 15 1974, or whatever.  But I could easily say Nov. 15th too.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I never mind at all if you ask one question or more than one. Honestly. I enjoy answering.
As for digital games I don't play them at all so I don't know how speech might differ with players who do.  As for me I think I'd use the same prepositions I'd use with actual, physical games or activities.  For example if my friend and I play tennis and he normally wins the games I could say, "He usually beats me at tennis."   IF we played poker, for example, I probably would say, "He usually beats me in poker."  So it's hard to say for sure which is technically correct.  I'm sure the way things are today you could get by with saying pretty much anything. And with video or online games I would assume you could do the same. I'm sorry if at times I cannot be more specific or more helpful.  Some things today seem odd or foreign to me because I'm not really in tune with a lot of what goes on.  I guess I'm what they call an "old fart" at times now......

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi This one is easy.  Costed is not correct. You would use cost. 
It would have cost me 500 dollars.
My new TV cost 700 dollars.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, as far as using it to express how much you paid for something you don't.  Cost is the correct word here. 
But to cost something (other than how much you paid for it) can be used when someone or some company, for example, does a study on how much a project or a plan will cost to implement.  The process of determining this is called costing.  And in past tense it is costed. 
I found this on Google and it explains it better.
“Cost” can also mean to estimate or determine the cost of something. If you are using that meaning of the word “cost,” then “costed” is the past tense and the past participle. So if some accountants wanted to total up a business’s expenses, you could say they costed out the expenses."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In that direction, or in the direction of would be correct.  I've never heard of using "at" when it comes to where something is located. 
"Which way is the train station?"  "It's in that direction, toward the office tower."
However direction can also be used when someone gives you advice or tells you to do something or makes a decision. Almost like a director in a play or a movie. So in this case you can use "at" in some circumstances. 
"At the direction of the judge the defendant was remanded to jail without bail."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Please, don't ever feel bad about how many questions you ask. It's my pleasure to help.  
This is a bit tricky because the way English is set up we tend to not always use the correct words sometimes. Literally if you were saying it you would say "someone tried to defend himself or herself."  Or if it was more than one person you'd then say, "They tried to defend themselves."  But it's easier, when it's just one person, to use "themself" but to be honest you might hear people say "themselves" even when it's just a single person.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I agree that the first one is not correct. But footballers are not human would make sense in the context you mentioned.  Like they are such good athletes and work so hard, or play so well, that they almost seem beyond human ability.

HebrewDane · Answer

It would be "athlete" because using any in "any other" refers to a singular concept. So the singular athlete would be correct.  IF you said "James works harder than all other athletes" then it's a plural concept.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In song lyrics, as with poetry, etc. it's fair game when it comes to English usage. Meaning you can pretty much say or write whatever you want even if it isn't correct or even close to being correct.  So in this case, even though I'm not familiar with the song, it is simply a matter of poetic license, as they call it.  To me if someone said, even in jest, they live on the west side of America I'd think they live in California perhaps. But in any case it's just song lyrics. They don't even have to make sense, really. 
In real terms, though, if I wanted to say where I live in my country I'd say it this way. In fact I moved from the northern part of the USA to the south. I now live in the south, in North Carolina. So usually people would say they live in the north, on the east coast, in the south, in the midwest, in the northwest (Like Seattle) or on the west coast. Just some examples.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You comment makes me smile. Seeing that today, here in my country, it is Father's Day. A special day to honor fathers. My own father passed away many years ago. But he was always saying how confusing English was and complaining, in a way, about all the exceptions. I have a friend from Mexico who lived in the USA for many years. Learning English and getting a college degree in engineering. And after all that time he still felt frustrated about English and how many exceptions and rules there are. As a native speaker it usually sounds good and makes sense but that's because we learn it as children and don't question.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, they can mean somewhat the same thing at times. I'll try to explain. 
Firstly if you wanted to comment about seeing someone who is far off you could say either "I saw you from a distance" or "I saw you in the distance."  But it's also a matter of perspective too. 
I saw you in the distance means you were a certain distance away from where I am.  Say you were two blocks down the street. I was standing there and saw you two blocks away from me. In the distance.
If I saw you from a distance it's sort of like from the other person's position.   I was a certain distance away from you. It would be a more general way of saying that I was a certain distance away from you.  
And I KNOW you will read this and think WHAT?  Can it be that complicated?  So my answer to that is no.  Basically you could say either one. And they'd express the same concept. I would not fuss or worry about which to use really.
Now as for "at a distance" it can mean a bit different.  Say I was approaching a very mean dog who was roaming loose on my street. I would want to keep him "at a distance" meaning I don't want to get too close to him.  I'm staying over here and trying to avoid him while he's over there.  We also say "keep a distance" in this same context. Or "keep your distance" say, if you were at a zoo, there might be a sign that says this near an animal enclosure. So people don't get too close. Or if you were in a national park where wild animals roam free, like bison, you would want to keep your distance from them. Keep them at a distance from you.  
I know I tend to overdo it sometimes with my detailed answers. I hope I don't confuse you....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I am answering this question using my phone because I'm sitting out on the porch right now but I will do the rest later on my computer because it's easier for me to see into type. you would say the shop is either at the corner or on the corner. I can explain more when I'm on my laptop

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Sorry it took so long to finish these replies. 
Really, you could say it either way I guess. The shop is on the corner or at the corner. However, as I often do, I like to share with you my preferences or my perspective on certain words.  To me on the corner means location whereas at the corner can mean direction. I'll explain. 
"The shop is on the corner at the next intersection."
"How do I get to the post office from here?"  "Well, go up to the next street. There is a shop at the corner. Then turn left and the post office is on the right."

It's a subtle thing and as I said you could say either on or at the corner for the most part.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi  I forgot to stress before that you don't say "the shop is in corner of the street" as it just doesn't work.  If something is in a corner it would be something like "the table is in the corner of the room" or "the student had to stand in the corner during class."

As for walking.  If you said I am walking in the street that would mean you are literally in the street where the vehicles drive. "The man was struck by a truck while walking in the street."
IF you said I'm walking on the street it usually means you are walking along the very edge of the street but over far enough so as not to be hit by a vehicle. It can also mean you are simply walking down the sidewalk on a street but in this case we normally say "walking down the street" or "walking up the street" depending.  Or "walking along the street"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You ask such good questions. This one I had to think about for a bit. And I hope I am telling you correctly.  The little rule I mentioned, which you used, doesn't apply the same way here. And I think it's because of the additional "other than" which could also be replaced with "but" or "except" too.
So the me refers back to the other than, but, or except.  And in that case me is the word I'd use.
"Everyone else but me played games."  "Everyone except me played games."  "Everyone other than me played games."
This might be a rather flimsy explanation. It's a good example of how rules that seem clear cut sometimes don't seem to apply all the time or in the same way.  I hope I didn't confuse you.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In this case my little rule does apply.  "Jack and I played games" or "Jack and me played games" and the first one sounds right and is correct. 
I know this all sounds like opposites. It is even confusing to me, a life-long English speaker. But I did find this page when I Googled it and thought it might be helpful to you.
https://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/everyone-except-me.262619/

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You make me smile. Really, I don't even notice those small things in your questions. And trust me. Most English speakers today wouldn't know whether you start a sentence with And or when to use commas. In fact I think most people use commas much to often even when they are not required.

As for your question you can use the word studies as noun.  It would be like saying, "Concentrate on your exercises" or "Concentrate on your responsibilities."  
You could say "on your studying" and that would not be wrong. But in a sense using studying is a bit more specific. To me it would mean that I am actually doing studying right now and someone is saying I need to concentrate on what I'm doing. I might be fidgeting or not paying attention, etc. Studies is a more general term for what you are learning and studying overall. So if someone says to me "Concentrate on your studies" it could mean they want me to focus on my education and not focus on other distracting things, like sports, or dating, or hobbies.  I hope this makes sense.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I agree that saying, "They have been our friend" does sound odd. To me it should be "They have been our friends"  or "They have been friends to us...."  It might just be the way the person in the show spoke. As I said very, very often I hear people say the wrong words or use the wrong grammar. Daily.
Again, to me saying "He made zero contribution" sounds better and I think it's even more effective. Stressing how poorly he played.  You could say also, "He contributed nothing during the game" and that would work. I guess it's OK to say "zero contributions" but it doesn't sound as good to me.
I give you credit for watching a British program. Which one, may I ask?  I often watch them and yet also have trouble sometimes catching what they say due to the accents and the different slangs, etc. If it's available I'll turn on closed-captioning to help me understand. 
I would say "at a time like this" but I guess saying "in" would not be considered incorrect. It just doesn't sound as natural to me. And yes, you can say "At times like this" or "In times like this" or "During times like this" and another way to say it is "At times such as this" or "In times such as this" and well, you get the idea.....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Hmmm. I have not heard of it before.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I love your questions.  And my answer for this one will be more of a preference or opinion probably than a specific grammatical rule. 
I look at it this way.  I think starting with human/humans will work best. To me being human is an expression of humans. If that makes sense. It's not just a matter of singular/plural in this case.  Humans are all human. Humans are individual human beings. So if you say, "We are all humans" that is true and it means we are all homo sapiens.  And we are human. Meaning we all have the essence of being human. We have feelings, fears, thoughts, faults, talents, etc.  So being human is part of what makes us all humans.
Now with Christian/Christians I view it the same.  Christians are people who are Christian.  Each Christian person has similar beliefs and ideas, for the most part. There is a bond among them. So, like with human/humans, I would say that Christians are all Christian. 
This probably sounds silly but to me there is a nuance of difference. But for the most part, in your examples, you could say either one. 
But in a way we are all humans but individually each one of us is human. They are all Christians but each one is a Christian person.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, you put it very concisely. Sometimes I get too wordy.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, this is correct.  
Is the restaurant on Main Street?
Yes, it is at 430 Main Street.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, in a case like this using crime in the singular is like saying poverty, inflation, hunger, etc.  Like when we say "the crime rate has increased in the past year" or "violent crime has gone down slightly."  It's just a general term. 
In regular speech there still is a place for crime (singular) and crimes (plural.)  
"Have you ever been the victim of a crime?"
"Yes, in fact I have been the victim of two crimes in my life. I was robbed once and also assaulted."

You might hear on the news what voters are most concerned about in a coming election. It may be things like "inflation, taxes, rising crime, high cost of college, etc."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi you are correct in that informal English everyone is considered a singular concept. But what I was probably trying to express his how people would use that word in Daily informal conversation or writing and in that case it's usually considered a plural concept. So I guess the bottom line is you could say in everyone's heart or in everyone's hearts and I don't think anybody would think it sounded odd. It's another example of how when we speak everyday we don't always follow the exact grammatical rules. I imagine it's the same way in most languages. I didn't mean to confuse you before though

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I have a correction. My voice to type feature printed out informal in the above answer instead of two separate words in formal. So please don't read it the way it's written

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I somehow missed this question. At least I don't think I answered it, did I?
I don't think most people would say "in the plane"  but they would say "on the plane." Like on the bus or on the train.  Now if someone asked me where I was seated on the plane I could say I was sitting in the back of the plane. Or in the front of the plane, or bus, etc. 
But then we say sitting in a car. Sitting in a chair. But sitting on a sofa. Sitting on the porch. I guess it can be confusing to know which is which....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I would say "everyone brought their phones" or "everyone brought their phone" which to me is probably a bit better because the other one might also mean each brought more than one phone. Anyway, you can say his/her and it's probably a bit more formal but people would not speak it  usually.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi No, please. I can see that sometimes when I read back to see if I've missed something I don't always see all the questions. So if it appears that I've missed anything just let me know and ask again. I truly enjoy answering your questions.

HebrewDane · Answer

You can ask, "Is the shop open on Sunday?" but this can also be like asking is the shop open on this coming Sunday and not is it open in general on all Sundays. Do you see what I mean. Say, for example, there is a holiday that falls on a Sunday and someone might not be sure if a certain store will be open on that day due to it being a holiday. So you would ask, "Is the shop open on Sunday?"
As for asking if a shop has normal hours on Sundays then I'd ask, "Are you open on Sundays?" or "Is the store open on Sundays?"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I would say "Everyone  was on the edge of their seats" but a lot of people would say "on the edge of their seat."  To be honest I'm not exactly sure which is the grammatically correct one. But to me the first one I wrote makes more sense.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Do you mean two servings of ice cream?  Meaning ice cream for two people? Or do you mean two scoops of ice cream?  Either way what you wrote would be fine. It is respectful.  "May I have two please?"  "I'd like two ice creams please."  Or if you wanted two scoops it's the same. "May I have two scoops please?"  "I'd like two scoops. One chocolate and one vanilla."
To be honest if someone is nice enough to say please and thank you today it's something special. People have gotten rather rude in our society and civility has become rare. I was raised to say please and thank you and be respectful.  But I guess times have changed.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You never sound rude to me. I find you to be very polite, thoughtful, and insightful.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Actually in this case what I would say myself is the correct way too. It's correct to say "would have gotten" although many people say it the other way - you would have got. Even though it's not correct. 
As I type I hear fireworks going off in my neighborhood. Tomorrow is our independence day. July Fourth. But people are celebrating early.  It can get loud.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I had to look up Nike air force 1.  I guess I'm out of touch. I think in this case people might say "ones" to refer to a pair of Nike shoes instead of saying "a pair of Nike Air Force 1 shoes."  They just leave off the word shoes and make the 1 plural instead.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Is this like the one "How many months have 28 days?  And the answer is " all of them."  So I assume that yes, China has a fourth of July.  Am I right?  Lol
I feel like we've developed a sort of friendship here. I like that.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi They are basically the same, I'd say. However I think that "look in the eye" is used more for when you are telling someone to do that.  
"Look me in the eye and tell me the truth this time."

And "look in the eyes" would be used more for something like, "I looked into her eyes and saw an expression of pure love."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, in this context what he says sort of means that he was away at college. He was not in the same place as his father when he ran the shop.  He was someplace else. "Where you were then?"  "I was away at college."
In college would be like "I was in college back in the mid-70's"

"When did your mother die?"  "She died while I was away at college"
"Did you go to school after high school?"  "Yes. I was in college for four years."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I don't think there is a difference. AT least not to my ear. You could say it either way and people would understand.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In both examples there is really no difference.  People would say "half the things she was saying" or "half of the things she was saying."
The same with quarter of a million dollars or a quarter million dollars. I think it's just a preference on the speaker's part.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You explained it clearly. Here is my take. 
To say "it's double last year" is acceptable although not very good English. But as you said people would know what he meant. 
As for your suggestion it's very close.  You could say, "It's double what it was last year" without the "of."
You could also say, "The price has doubled since last year."  
"The price is twice what it was last year."
There are a few good ways to express this.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi  Yes, you can say two or more names.  "Mom, Dad, my sister, and I did the decorated the Christmas tree."
And the second is yes also.  Between him and me is like saying "between him" and "between me."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You would say "in his debut match" in a context like this.  
"In his first game with the team he suffered a serious injury."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'm sorry it took so long to reply to the other questions. I was sort of offline yesterday.  Firstly, if you already know the person is a male ("have you watched this guy's You Tube videos")  then you should answer like this. "No, I haven't watched any of his videos."   If you didn't know the gender you could say "I never watched any of their videos."
If use "any" or "any of his/hers/their"  you'd have to say videos. In the plural. I know we've discussed using the singular vs. the plural before but in a context like this the plural would be appropriate.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi In a context like this you can say either one.  All my mother's problems or all of my mother's problems.  If you say "all" the "of" is sort of assumed. So it's not required to use it.
"I hope I packed all the things I will need for my vacation."
"I hope I packed all of the things I will need for my vacation."

HebrewDane · Answer

You could say it two ways to be correct.
I have forgotten how to play this game.
I forgot how to play this game.

The only difference is forgotten in one and forgot in the other.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi you are pretty close. What we say here for example where I live we sometimes get hurricanes and we lose electricity. So the way we would say it is the power went out or the power went off and then when it comes back you would say the power is back on or the power came back on. It's really quite basic.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I think you are safe in what you said. Go with the safe option. As we've discussed in the past people, including myself sometimes, tend to speak incorrectly and somewhat lazily. Many don't follow grammatical rules much. You would often hear, "I got beat" or something like that.  But if it is on your mind to try and speak as correctly as possible I'd make that the goal. And also realize that if you made a mistake, even inadvertently, nobody would probably notice.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi believe me when I tell you this. In the. time that we have communicated I think your grasp of the English language is better than a lot of people over here who are natives and went to school to learn English officially. And the way people speak today nobody would really notice a mistake that was common and often heard. and don't be afraid when you're speaking that you might make a mistake because if you do make a mistake that's something you need to change someone will just give you advice and then you would learn and do better next time. People would not laugh or make fun of you believe me with the level of English that I feel you have already acquired

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I am answering these questions on my phone using my voice so I apologize for any errors. It would not be correct to use the word saw in this case. It would have to be I would never have seen you again. and while we're on the subject of using saw and seen a lot of people over here use seen incorrectly. instead of saying yesterday I saw a dog they would say yesterday I seen a dog. this is extremely common and even among people who I considered to be educated and intelligent. I don't know why so many people misuse the word but just a heads up to you so you're aware of it and would recognize it if you heard someone making that mistake

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi this is one but I can't say for sure but I will just tell you what I think. I don't believe that there is any real grammatical difference between saying himself and Charles or him and Charles. I think of the two I would probably say between him and Charles but that's just my preference. I'm not positive if there might be some technical grammatical difference but I'm not aware of one

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It pleases me to know I've been helpful. I know what it is like trying to learn a language and even after understanding a lot in ones mind there's always some fear of actually attempting to speak.  Be bold and confident. It's the only way, I feel. Jump in with both feet, as we say over here.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi This is another example of something that could go either way.  However if I was speaking face to face with another fan I'd probably just say, "Brace yourself for next season."   And if I was speaking to a group or referring to a group in some way, I'd say "yourselves."  But to be honest I think it would be OK to say it either way even though it is a matter of singular and plural in reality.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, in the example you gave they are interchangeable. For the most part they can mean the same thing. But in another sense they can be slightly different. They can mean the actual physical structure - house/home - as in your example. But home also has a meaning that is not so literal. Not just the structure. But the life, family, experiences, etc. of living in a house with the family.  I'll try to explain.  
A family lives in a house. But is it a good home?  Is there love there? Security? 
Sometimes you might hear the phrase "a happy home" or "love is what makes a house a home."  Maybe "my friend from school grew up in an unhappy home."   Or "my life at home growing up was not good."  Or if you visited a friend he/she might say, "Welcome to my home"
So I hope you can see that beyond the actual structure of house/home the concept of "home" can mean something different too.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, I would normally say "looking back on life"  or "looking back on my life."  Which would mean taking a general look over what a person's life has been. The memories. The good and the bad. The choices. The accomplishments, etc. 
But I think you could also say "looking back in my life" to mean that I'm going back in my mind to a particular time or event.  Not a general reminiscence of the whole life so far but recalling a specific thing.  
Looking back in my life to when I was in college I somehow knew I'd never be able to graduate as I'd planned.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Actually I don't find it incorrect for the most part.  I might make a couple minor changes.
"Some people are born millionaires but some work to make themselves millionaires."
"Some people are born millionaires but others work to become millionaires."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I did not realize it was an American thing, to be honest. But yes, people say on-air or on the air. Either one. 
One example where they use only one of them comes to mind, though.  On the news here, when they are saying the different ways that someone can watch or follow the news, they will say something like this. 
"Follow ABC11 on-air, online, or on any device."  So in this case on-air is a choice that probably wouldn't work if you said "on the air."  On the air would be more used for the guy who mentioned the ways to connect with the news. He's sitting at his desk during a commercial. Waiting for his turn to be on camera again.  The director points to him and says, "You are now on the air" and the guy starts to talk into the camera. Do you follow me?

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I don't think it's right to say "on second position" like that. Especially in a race or a contest. We say "In" and also we say "place" usually, instead of position. So in your example we'd say "He was in second place."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi This is one of those ones that you have to think about a bit. What he is really saying is that it's mostly a female audience that watches him. The audience who watches him is a mostly female one. Which basically does mean an audience of mostly females.  So it's a case of "an audience of females" or "a female audience."  
But to be honest you could say either female or females if you want.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You are correct. It should be "I am a pro at this."
I think many younger people today are getting too casual and almost sloppy with English. Plus I don't think they teach English as thoroughly in school now as when I was a kid.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, the only difference I would say could be this.  "What movie do you want to watch?"   (There are lots of movies to choose from. On Netfilx or Hulu, etc. Is there a particular one you are interested in?"
"Which movie to you want to watch?"  (There are a few that I have in mind and have mentioned to you. Pick the one, of of these, that you'd like to watch.)
But in general you could say it either way and people would understand. You are simply asking about the movie they'd prefer watching.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Something that you have no control over would be "out of your hands."
"I can't allow you to enter. There is a rule against it and I have no choice. It's out of my hands."
It's funny but until I started answering questions on this site I never realized how many expressions and odd things we say in English that probably make little sense to others. To use they just sound normal and natural I guess....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You play "at" a certain level. Whether it be a sport, a musical instrument, or whatever.  So you could say, "At the level my son plays you are lucky the score was only 5-0."   You don't need the second "at"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I would say no to adding the "s" actually.  If you say someone plays on the under 19 team you are actually saying "under 19 years of age" so there is no added "s"
You come up with such interesting questions. Intelligent ones.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, I understand. 
As for the temperature.  It's odd for me using Celsius.  Anyway, you could say "she had a 37-degree fever."  But it would be more natural to day "she had a fever of 37 degrees." or "She had a temperature of 37 degrees."
For the second one it's better without the "s" really.  
"He is a five-time champion."  "Lebron James is a four-time MVP winner."
The five-time, four-time, etc. is hyphenated because the two words actually become sort of a one-word concept.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I forgot to mention you can use "times" if you change the wording.
"He was the champion league winner five times."
"Lebron was named NBA MVP four times."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, I agree with the teacher's expression of saying "in schools" because that's how most would say it.  I would also probably change it to "they don't teach it in school anymore and make it singular even though I'm referring to more than one school. It would be like saying, "that's what they do in church today" meaning in churches.  
The difference, however slight, between saying "in school" and "at school" could be explained, hopefully, like this.  At school would be more like a location.  "Where is Tommy today?"  "He's at school till noon."
In school would refer more to the concept of learning in a school or a time period when one was learning in school.  "Back when I was in school I learned how to write cursive."  
"When my daughter was still in school she was in the marching band."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Studies would be correct here. Sometimes we say "studies" to sort of mean school, education, studying, etc. in general.  
I might as my son, in high school, something like, "How are your studies coming?"  meaning how are things going in school with what you are studying/learning?  It can almost mean something like lessons. If I was studying French, for example, someone might mention how my French studies are going.  So studies, in your example, would work fine.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi You would say "The lady is six months pregnant."  I guess you could say "A six-months pregnant lady" also.  In any case you would use the plural.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, you are correct. It should be "we, as humans, ....."  You could say, "We, as human beings, should respect the earth."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I wondered if you were OK. I, myself, was away for two weeks on vacation and didn't have my laptop with me. And I didn't do this app on my phone. Then when I returned I got sick and have been under the weather for the last few weeks. So I am glad to be feeling mostly better now. I just started back on this site during the week. Glad you are OK. Hope exams went well.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi To be honest I was not aware that the first way, using criticizes, is wrong. I tried to look up online to see about rules for this word but I couldn't.  So in my mind I'd say nobody would notice if you said criticizes. I wouldn't.  But could I ask what your source is about which is correct? I'm not doubting you. I just would like to learn the correct way after all these years of speaking English.  Sometimes even native speakers get things wrong, believe me. Btw, I'm feeling much better finally.  Hope you are well.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I started to think about how I would say it and I would most likely say "He's the type of person who criticizes others" so I never thought about a different way to say it.  I guess it's one of those things that isn't clear.  I'm sure, though, that if you were speaking to a native speaker and said either one it would be understood and not a problem.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Yes, it's interesting. I have found that since being on this site I have to sometimes think about why I, or why we, say things a certain way. When the language you speak is the one you learned growing up it's often thought of as being "the way it is" and people tend not to question why.  And there are times when I can't say for sure one way or another. I too have learned a lot about English even though I've been speaking it all my life.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi IT does sound a bit odd although I doubt I'd pay much attention to it if I saw it. What I think makes it sound off is using two gerunds back to back almost.
Watching and getting.  Maybe one of these would sound better.
"It's sad to watch him getting old"  or maybe "It's sad watching him get old."
Of all the choices I think I'd go with "It's sad watching him get old" myself. I think it sounds the best.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi The alarm isn't sounding would be the right one. You could say "the alert isn't showing up on my phone" if, for example, you had a weather alert or something like that scheduled on your phone.  Hope you are well these days....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'm just a bit confused. I see only one "off" but one "of" as well.  So I will assume you mean could the host have said, "Do you try to base your game off that player?"
I would say yes. I think it would be OK.  I feel that "off of" would be better but in my mind the "of" is more or less inferred. So it could be omitted without changing the meaning. Regardless if you said it without the "of" nobody would notice or think it odd.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I agree with you. It should be drunk. I know this is an issue that many people find confusing, including myself. It's almost like lay, lie, laid, lain, etc. 
I found this on a website that seems to make it clear:

Drank" is the past tense of "to drink." For example:
I drank my coffee too quickly.
"Drunk" is the past participle of "to drink" (i.e., the version that follows "had," "has," or "have"). For example:
I have drunk too much.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'm doing well. I hope you are too.
The thing with this situation is that technically you aren't supposed to end a sentence with words like "from."  In really correct English you'd ask, "From where did you get those pants?"  but I can almost guarantee you that few would say it that way. So to answer your question it is perfectly fine to just ask,'Where did you get those pants?"  You'd sound like a real native.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi It's funny you ask this. I was never much of a soccer (football) fan before. I didn't understand the game or the rules much. But I started watching some of the World Cup games and really got interested in it. It's quite a sport. 
Anyway as to your question. I'd say that "the Moroccan players" is the correct way.  IF you wanted to say it the other way you'd have to say, "The players from Morocco are like our brothers."

HebrewDane · Answer

You can say "we doctors" or "we Christians" or whoever. We is the correct word. 
I'm doing well. I hope you are too.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi For the most part you can say "fruit" in the singular. It can be singular or plural, like deer.  
"Do you want some fruit?"
"Sure, I'd like an apple and an orange, please."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Well, on this topic I can speak from experience. I do have just one brother and one sister. So if I want to express this I'd say "We are brothers and sister."   If I had more than one sister I'd say "We are brothers and sisters."   You can also use the word "sibling(s) too which has no gender.

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi We don't use kilometers, as you know. But it should make any difference here. If it was kilometers or miles this guy was referring to he should have said kilometers or miles.  Now one thing I have to mention.  I did know a fellow from a different state in the USA. Pennsylvania. He was from a very rural area and when he spoke of driving, for instance, he'd say "Oh, it's just two mile up the road."  He'd use singular when it would normally be plural.  So maybe the guy in the video was from an area like this where it's just a regional way of speaking. But correctly it should be plural here. 
I'm doing well. I hope you are too. Stay safe.....

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I am OK. I hope you and your family are too. 
I would say that using "seen" is more natural.   To me saying seen could mean seeing it in a theater, like in the old says when that was pretty much the only choice. Or seeing it on TV.
Here is how a conversaiont might go.
"Hey, have you seen the new movie on Netfilx yet?"
"Yes, I watched it at home last night."

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi I'm doing well, thanks. I hope you and your loved ones are as well.
As for the question probably either watched or seen could work interchangeably. But to me I have a preference. Not sure if others would agree but for a TV show I'd do like you said. "Have you watched the show "Breaking Bad" on Netfix?" But for a movie I'd say, "Have you seen the new Tom Cruise movie?"

HebrewDane · Answer

@Shazil_Qureshi Please forgive my other reply. I don't have my reading glasses on and I misread the word. I thought it said "comprimised" but it's "comprised" and it's not a verb. It means what something is made of.  Like "The meal was comrpised of steak, mashed potatoes and peas."  or "The evidence was comprised of one partial fingerprint and one shoe print."
I deleted my previous answer anyway. I didn't want to confuse you.

@Shazil_Qureshi If you wanted to say that you met someone you didn't know before like at the mall, or someplace, you could say "we met by chance at the mall" for example.Like "How did you two meet?" "We just met by chance one day at the mall."

Stellen Sie Muttersprachlern kostenlos fragen

@Shazil_Qureshi If you wanted to say that you met someone you didn't know before like at the mall, or someplace, you could say "we met by chance at the mall" for example.
Like "How did you two meet?" "We just met by chance one day at the mall."